 |

  |
 |
| |
|
|
| Subject |
Seriously? read a book, or do some GD research |
 |
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
jkperformance on October 18, 2013 at 11:43 PM |
 |
| |
This message has been viewed 312 times. |
 |
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
I stand corrected, the latter aren't even hazards to the posted by LJZTT on October 18, 2013 at 01:01 AM |
 |
| |
|
|
| Message |
[ http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/303na1.pdf ] here, cliff's notes, since you obviously can't be bothered to read and do any research: "The batteries that require the most energy for their production are nickel-metal-hydride, at 90 MegaJoules (MJ) per kilogram (kg) of battery produced and lithium-ion, at 88-90 MJ per kg. This is reflected in their impact on fossil fuel depletion, with both lithium-ion and nickel-metal-hydride using around 1.6 kg of oil equivalent per kg of battery produced. These two batteries also perform the worst in terms of GHG emissions, with up to 12.5kg of CO2 equivalent for each kg of nickel-metal-hydride batteries. The sodium-sulphur and lead-acid batteries performed the best in terms of energy requirements and GHG emissions"
|
 |
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|